Noises Off

A motif of Noises Off is the concept of order.  The characters in this play are constantly attempting to restore order to the gradual demise of their play “Nothing On.”  The characters’ attempts prove futile as the play deteriorates throughout the production process.  The cast members desperately try to maintain composure and resort to sabotaging their fellow actors resulting in a terrifying descent into hilarious chaos.  In each act, the actors’ relationships have gotten a little more complicated and their performances a little more belligerent. 
A ‘tag line’ for this play could be “There’s some perfectly rational explanation for all this.”  The characters’ attempts to restore order where there is seemingly none and just discord and escalating chaos embodies this quote from Roger.  The characters either attempt to restore the lost order or pursue antics and other personal problems.  Either way there is an explanation for all the incidents and shenanigans that occur and the build up of the destruction of the play in Act III. 

Buried Child

The way I understand Realism is that it is a truthful treatment of ordinary people involved in ordinary dilemmas of life.  In my encounters with realism I have seen a general focus on the middle class and not the lives of the poor and socially outcast.  Therefore I do not believe that Buried Child is not an example or realism.  The preface to Buried Child in the Norton Anthology of Drama explains that Shepard was exposed to Theatre of the Absurd through Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett.  Although this except states that Shepard claims he did not understand the play I believe that this greatly influenced his writing and Buried Child.  My understanding of Theatre of the Absurd as defined by Martin Esslin is a combination of Existentialism, “the only significant action and individual can take is to accept responsibility for his or her own deeds,” and avant-garde dramatic form.  The plots tend to move in circular form.  Ending in the same structure they began.  This can be seen in Buried Child where Vince mirrors Dodge.  Although I am not convinced that Buried Child is an example of Theatre of the Absurd I do believe that it has been strongly influenced by this theatrical approach.

Show and Tell #2

The Maids Tragedy is an Jacobean English Renaissance play.  It is an example of collaborative drama writing, which was common for the era.  Both Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher are credited as the playwrights and most likely composed this play around 1610.  It premiered at the Blackfriars Theatre, an in-door private theatre; it also received commission for performances at court.  This play was written for a more middle and upper class audience target.
In The Maids Tragedy a noblemen Amintor is engaged to woman Aspatia; however the King, labeled simply as the King, demands that Amintor marry Evadne instead so as to raise her status to the court life so that he may continue his affair with her.  Evadne refuses to consummate her marriage with Amintor due to her loyalty to the King.  Melantius, Evadne’s brother and Amintor’s friend, is disgusted by Evadne’s behaviors and plots to kill the King.  Aspatia, who disappeared after scene 2 in Act 1 reappears in Act 5 scene 3 disguised as her ‘brother,’ she challenges Amintor to a duel in which Amintor kills her and the two reconcile.  Evadne then enters after stabbing the King and attempts to salvage her marriage with Amintor.  He refuses her and she kills herself, and so then Amintor takes his own life.  Melantius attempts to take his life as well but he is stopped and so he vows to starve himself to death in prison.  The King’s brother Lysippus becomes the new king and the monarchy and order are restored to the world of the play.
The ideas of absolute monarchy and gender roles are two of the major themes found in this play.  In this play the King portrays the idea of absolute monarchy and divine right.  Lysippus identifies this theme in scene 1 Act 1 with his remark “the breath of kings is like the breath of gods” (1148).  The characters of this play do not question the authority of the King.  For example when Aminor learns that Evadne has a lover he threatens to challenge the person to a duel, but once he learns that her lover is the King he immediately resigns to his judgement and says, “what frail man dares lift hand against him?  Let the gods speak to him when they please; till when, let us suffer and wait” (1166).  The idea of absolute monarchy and divine right is prevalent throughout the play and reinforced by Amnitor’s words and actions.  The other main idea of gender reversal is seen predominantly in Evadne and Amintor.  For this ear women were thought and supposed to uphold the ideals of honor, loyalty, and fidelity.  Amintor reflects these feminine qualities more than Evadne.  Aminotr is the character who is chaste and obedient in contrast to Evadne.  Evadne aspires for power and is aware of her sexual power.  She is an honest character in how she views and upholds her own honor code.  Evadne goes through a crisis of conscience that would usually be associated for men, such as Hamlet.  She contradicts the silent, chaste, and obedient status of women.  She pushes her femininity aside in favor of violence and changes her status and declares, “I am a tiger; I am anything that knows not pity” (1201).  This play attempts to aspire chivalric ideals with absolute monarchy and divine right but in doing so corrupts the ideal of gender in characters.

The Glass of Water

If I had to pick a protagonist for The Glass of Water I would choose Bolingbroke.  He is the pursuer of the action of the play.  Bolingbroke strives for opposition of the Duchess and these conflicts appear to be the main driving force for the play.  These two figures constantly strive for the upper hand of their quarrels.  Bolingbroke seeming strives for the good of the English people as a whole and the Duchess seemingly for her own selfish intentions.  These actions signify Bolingbroke as one of the more important characters of this play, and between him and the Duchess Bolingbroke appears to have more characteristics of a protagonist in effects of driving the plot of the play.  Bolingbroke pushes the action in his pursuit of revealing the wicked intentions of the Duchess and attempts to help England attain peace with France through the admittance of the Marquis to the Queen’s court.  Bolingbroke attempts to sneak the Marquis into the Queen’s audience through Marsham and later Abigail.  The Duchess thwarts both of his attempts; however Bolingbroke is successful in forcing the Duchess to admit Abigail into the Queen’s court through blackmail through her secret infatuation and constant promotion of Marsham.  Bolingbroke is able to use this weakness in the Duchess to fulfill his goals of attaining an audience with the Queen for the Marquis.  Both Bolingbroke and the Duchess strive for control of the Queen and both make successful strikes against each other through the Queen.  The Duchess controls the Queen through pure fear while Bolingbroke controls her through her emotions for Marsham.  Bolingbroke is the force that resolves obstacles for other characters such as manipulating situations so that Abigail and Marsham’s troubled love is reconciled at the end, he removes the Duchess’s malicious power from the Queen’s court, he secures signed papers from the Queen to ensure peace between England and France, and it seems that he has found a new ensign for the Queen to dote on in place of Marsham.  Bolingbroke’s immense time on stage and influential actions are a powerful force that credit him as the protagonist of Eugene Scribe’s The Glass of Water.